Jennings and Jennings - Attorneys At Law

Jennings and Jennings
10138-C Hull Street Road
Midlothian VA 23112
804-335-0893
Toll Free: 866-655-3982
Fax: 804-276-8013
Email Us

Representing Individuals and Small Businesses in Virginia
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Call Toll Free 1-866-655-3982
HomeFirm OverviewAttorney ProfilesPractice AreasFamily Law FAQsResource LinksContact Us

Family Law Information Center - more
Family Law FAQs - Click for Solutions

PrintSaveEmail

Client Portal


MasterCard, Visa, American Express, Discover

Virginia Court Decisions
Criminal Law - DUI & DWI Charges

0597074 DUI, DWI, Driving Under the Influence, Driving While Intoxicated, Breath Test Refusal, Criminal Law, Probable Cause - Ronald Lee Jones v. Commonwealth of Virginia 05/06/2008
Appellant's conviction of unreasonable refusal to provide a breath sample following an arrest for driving under the influence affirmed where trial court did not err in finding officer had probable cause to arrest appellant for driving under the influence based on totality of circumstances

2986064 Criminal Law, DUI, DWI, Driving Under the Influence, Driving While Intoxicated - Stacey Lynn Wright v. Commonwealth of Virginia 04/22/2008
Trial court erred in overruling appellant's timely objection that the unlawful nolle prosequi of the same offense in an earlier district court proceeding deprived her of her statutory right to a preliminary hearing; conviction is reversed and indictment is dismissed without prejudice

0305072 DUI; Evidence - Billie Denise Brown v. Commonwealth of Virginia 04/08/2008
No error in trial court's finding that evidence was sufficient to support conviction for driving under the influence, second offense in ten years; no merit to claim that Commonwealth failed to provide appellant was potentially exculpatory evidence in the form of a breath test as Code § 18.2-268.2 does not impose obligation on officer to offer breath test

1146074 DUI, Traffic; Criminal Law; Evidence - Frederick C. Mwangi v. Commonwealth of Virginia 04/15/2008
Trial court did not err in admitting unsigned order of conviction from general district court to prove prior DUI conviction where sufficient circumstantial evidence proved appellant was convicted of offense

2873063 Traffic; Criminal Law; DUI; DWI; Driving under the Influence; Due Process - William Jerry Wimbish v. Commonwealth of Virginia 04/08/2008
Conviction of driving under the influence affirmed where admission of certificate of analysis did not violate Confrontation Clause as breath test results and attestation clause of certificate are not "testimonial"; Code § 18.2-270 does not violate Due Process Clause as it does not contain an unconstitutional presumption

0069074 Traffic; Criminal Law; DUI; DWI; Driving Under the Influence; Driving While Intoxicated; Malicious wounding; Trial procedure - Nelson Mauricio Melendez v. Commonwealth of Virginia 03/25/2008
Court is unable to review appellant's claim on appeal that trial court erred in denying his counsel the right to cross-examine witness in violation of the Sixth Amendment where no proffer of the expected testimony was made

0305072 Traffic; Criminal Law; DUI; DWI; Driving Under the Influence - Billie Denise Brown v. Commonwealth of Virginia 04/08/2008
No error in trial court's finding that evidence was sufficient to support conviction for driving under the influence, second offense in ten years; no merit to claim that Commonwealth failed to provide appellant was potentially exculpatory evidence in the form of a breath test as Code § 18.2-268.2 does not impose obligation on officer to offer breath test

2409064 Traffic; Criminal Law; DWI; DUI: Driving While Intoxicated - Brian Patrick Riley v. Commonwealth of Virginia 04/08/2008
Trial court did not err in convicting appellant of driving while intoxicated and maiming as a result of his driving while intoxicated where affirmative defense of unconsciousness was unavailable to appellant as he voluntarily ingested overdose of sleeping medication; evidence sufficient to support maiming conviction

2594062 Ki-Ho, s/k/a John Min v. Commonwalth of Virginia - DWI, DUI, Driving While Intoxicated, Blood Alcohol Analysis 03/25/2008
Trial court did not err in admitting the certificate of blood alcohol analysis in accordance with Code § 19.2-187 where appellant did not subpoena the "booking tech" and therefore waived his right to cross-examine the potential witness; appellant's claim that this evidence is not "covered" under Code § 19.2-187 is barred by Rule 5A:18

2490064 Driving Under the Influence Charges - Cheryl Brown-Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth of Virginia 02/05/2008
No error in trial court's refusal to dismiss charge of driving under the influence where breath test is not a statutorily mandated test under the implied consent law

2921063 DUI/Brethalyzer Test - Joshua Michael Pruitt v. Commonwealth of Virginia 02/05/2008
Trial court did not err in admitting certificate of analysis of breathalyzer test where circumstantial proved time of accident and thus when appellant was driving under the influence, in denying motion to suppress statement that he was operator of vehicle, and in finding evidence sufficient to support conviction of driving under the influence, third offense in five years

070137 DUI/Traffic Offense- Jackson v. Commonwealth 11/02/2007 (Revised 11/06/2007)
In a case where a hospital emergency room nurse administered a physician-prescribed narcotic pain analgesic to the defendant, who shortly thereafter caused his car to collide with a telephone pole, leading to a charge of violating Code § 18.2-266 by driving under the influence of a narcotic drug or any other self-administered intoxicant, the meaning of the statutory phrase is quite clear: the narcotic drug that the operator of the motor vehicle is "under the influence of" must be self-administered. Finding no merit in the Commonwealth's arguments, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the defendant's conviction for violation of Code § 18.2-266 is dismissed.

1356062 Driving While Intoxicated - John Boatwright, IV v. Commonwealth of Virginia 07/31/2007
As university police officer was within a statutorily prescribed distance from the jurisdictional limits of his service area, trial court properly denied motion to suppress and conviction of driving under the influence is affirmed

0972061 Third DUI/DWI Offense - George Edward Raab v. Commonwealth 05/01/2007
Trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to suppress; appellant's conviction for driving under the influence, third or subsequent offense, is affirmed

3164052 Driving Under the Influence - Kenneth Wayne Turner v. Commonwealth 03/06/2007
Circuit court erred in amending the warrant to charge driving under the influence, second or subsequent offense after appellant had been acquitted of that charge in a court of competent jurisdiction; judgment is reversed, appellant's conviction for DUI second offense is set aside, and the case is remanded for resentencing on the conviction of driving under the influence, first offense

A Richmond, Virginia, family law firm since 1961

Jennings and Jennings
Virginia DUI/DWI Defense Attorneys

10138 Hull Street Road
Midlothian, VA 23112
Office: 804-335-0893
Toll Free: 866-655-3982
Fax: 804-276-8013
E-Mail

Experienced Richmond drunk driving defense lawyers serving the State of Virginia, including the Richmond area, Chesterfield County, Henrico County, Goochland County, Hanover County, Amelia County, Dinwiddie County, Powhatan County and the communities of Midlothian, Chesterfield, Colonial Heights, Hopewell, Glen Allen, Ashland, Goochland, Hanover, Dinwiddie, Powhatan, Petersburg, New Kent, Oilville and Charles City.



Jennings and Jennings - Attorneys at Law

Home | Firm Overview | Attorney Profiles | Practice Areas | Family Law FAQs | Resource Links | Contact Us
Family Law Information Center | Family Law FAQs | DUI Defense | Site Map | Family Law Cases | Estate Planning Cases | Criminal Defense CasesChild Custody CasesChild Support CasesMarital Property Division Cases | Parental Rights CasesSpousal Support CasesDUI/DWI CasesDrug Charge CasesDomestic Assault Cases

Disclaimer: Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Indications of past case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in future cases.

Copyright © by Jennings and Jennings - Attorneys at Law. All rights reserved.